After an evaluation run completes, Doc Reviewer displays a color-coded result for every instruction section it analyzed. Each color reflects how well the section meets the configured quality criteria. Use the detail panel to read per-criterion feedback and LLM recommendations, then decide whether to act on the findings, mark false positives, or re-run the evaluation.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://www.doc-reviewer.site/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Color scale
Every evaluated instruction receives one of four colors based on the number and severity of criterion failures:| Color | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Green | All criteria met. The instruction is complete and well-structured. |
| Yellow | Minor issues found. The instruction is mostly correct but has room for improvement. |
| Orange | Notable problems found. The instruction is missing important elements or has structural issues. |
| Red | Critical issues found. The instruction has significant gaps that affect usability. |
You can open the color scale explanation at any time by clicking the How does evaluation work? ↗ link in the evaluation summary bar at the top of the document page.
Reading per-criterion results
Click any section in the document tree to open its detail panel on the right. The panel shows:- The section title and its classification
- The overall color result
- A list of individual criterion results — each criterion shows one of three states:
- OK — the criterion is satisfied
- Warning — the criterion is partially satisfied or borderline
- Error — the criterion is not satisfied
- Recommendations — a list of specific, LLM-generated suggestions explaining what is missing and how to fix it. Each recommendation is tied to the criterion it addresses.
Marking false positives
If you disagree with a criterion result — for example, the LLM flagged a step as missing a result description when one is clearly present — you can mark that criterion result as a false positive:- Open the section’s detail panel.
- Find the criterion result you want to override.
- Click the override toggle next to the criterion.
Re-evaluating a document
To re-run the evaluation — for example, after editing the source document, switching to a different LLM model, or updating criteria — click Evaluate again on the document page. The app re-evaluates all included instruction sections:- Colors, criteria results, recommendations, and the model name are updated with the new results.
- False positive overrides you set previously are preserved.
Only sections with classification instruction or possible that are toggled on for inclusion are sent to the LLM. Sections classified as non-instruction are never evaluated.
Resetting evaluation results
To delete all evaluation results for a document and start fresh — for example, if you want to remove all override history along with the results — use the reset option on the document page:- Open the document in the Evaluation page.
- Click the Reset evaluation action (available in the document options menu).
- Confirm the action.
Evaluation records for the document are deleted, including all false positive overrides. The document structure and sections remain intact. After resetting, you can run a clean evaluation with no prior history.